How does the experimental design with dogs and cats help address variability in a flea control study?

How does the experimental design with dogs and cats help address variability in a flea control study?

• A. By including random sampling techniques
• B. By performing the experiment multiple times
• C. By blocking subjects by species
• D. By using the same collar for all subjects

Answer: (C)

In an experimental design involving dogs and cats for a flea control study, blocking subjects by species is particularly effective in addressing variability. This approach recognizes the inherent differences between the two species that could influence the effectiveness of the flea control method. By grouping the subjects into blocks based on species, any variation in responses can be attributed more clearly to the treatment being tested rather than to differences that are simply due to the biological differences between dogs and cats. Blocking helps control for the variability that might occur if dogs and cats were mixed in the same treatment group. For instance, if one species had significantly different physiology or behavior affecting how they interact with the flea collars, this could skew the results. By ensuring that each treatment is represented within each species block, the researchers can more accurately assess the effectiveness of the flea control method while minimizing the potential confounding effects of the species difference. This design strategy enhances the precision of the study's results by allowing comparisons that account for the variation due to species, improving the overall reliability and validity of the conclusions drawn from the study.

In an experimental design involving dogs and cats for a flea control study, blocking subjects by species is particularly effective in addressing variability. This approach recognizes the inherent differences between the two species that could influence the effectiveness of the flea control method. By grouping the subjects into blocks based on species, any variation in responses can be attributed more clearly to the treatment being tested rather than to differences that are simply due to the biological differences between dogs and cats.

Blocking helps control for the variability that might occur if dogs and cats were mixed in the same treatment group. For instance, if one species had significantly different physiology or behavior affecting how they interact with the flea collars, this could skew the results. By ensuring that each treatment is represented within each species block, the researchers can more accurately assess the effectiveness of the flea control method while minimizing the potential confounding effects of the species difference.

This design strategy enhances the precision of the study's results by allowing comparisons that account for the variation due to species, improving the overall reliability and validity of the conclusions drawn from the study.